﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>SafetyIMPACT Forums / SafetyIMPACT Forums / SafetyIMPACT! Workshops  / Asking the Right "whys" in a 5-Why Investigation / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.3</generator><description>SafetyIMPACT Forums</description><link>http://www.safety-impact.com/Forums/</link><webMaster>pladuke@oe.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 03:01:28 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Asking the Right "whys" in a 5-Why Investigation</title><link>http://www.safety-impact.com/Forums/Topic22-20-1.aspx</link><description>For years I have been frustrated by the poor use of the 5 whys in root cause analysis.  It's a powerful methodology, but in general people ask the wrong questions and spend a lot of time needlessly pursuing red herrings.  When it comes to incident investigations  and/or continuous improvement events I think instead of asking a simple "why?" we should be asking "how?" as in how does this contribute to an unsafe workplace? instead of why?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any ideas?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Phil La Duke&lt;br&gt;www.safety-impact.com</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:24:25 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Phil La Duke</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>
